The Rise of the “Maybe” Candidate

Bekk Millwood
The Rise of the “Maybe” Candidate

One of the biggest shifts happening in recruitment right now, and one I experience daily across fitness, wellness, hospitality and service-led industries, is not a shortage of applicants.

It’s a shortage of decisiveness.

More candidates than ever are applying for roles, taking recruiter calls, attending interviews, progressing through multiple stages… only to stall at the point of commitment.

“We’re just seeing what’s out there.” “I need to think it over.” “I’m not actively looking.” “I’m waiting to see what happens with another role.” “I’m happy where I am, but open.”

As recruiters, hiring managers, and business owners, we’re spending a growing amount of time chasing candidates who, six or seven years ago, likely wouldn’t have entered a process unless they were genuinely ready to move.

And honestly? It’s changing the entire recruitment dynamic.

The Market Has Shifted From Active to Passive

A large percentage of the market today sits in what I’d call “passive curiosity.”

People are not necessarily unhappy. They’re not desperate to leave. But they are constantly scanning.

LinkedIn. Seek alerts. Instagram stories. Industry gossip. Recruiter messages. Competitor openings.

Candidates now consume opportunities the same way consumers browse products online.

Low commitment. Low urgency. High exposure.

The modern candidate often wants to:

Explore their value Benchmark salary expectations See what else exists Compare cultures Gather leverage internally Test confidence Validate whether they still “have it”

Without necessarily being emotionally or practically ready to make a move.

Interviews Have Become Discovery Sessions

In many cases now, interviews are no longer final-stage decision points.

They are exploratory conversations.

Candidates are using interviews to:

Understand the market Learn salary benchmarks Experience different brands Test whether they’re still employable Explore identity beyond their current role See if something “better” exists

Which means employers are often mistaking engagement for intent.

A candidate can interview brilliantly, appear enthusiastic, speak positively about the role… and still withdraw two days later because the emotional reality of change finally hits.

That’s the part people underestimate.

Changing jobs is not purely logical. It’s emotional.

Routine. Security. Identity. Friendships. Fear of failure. Fear of regret. Fear of making the wrong move.

Sometimes candidates do not realise how attached they are to their current environment until they are actually faced with leaving it.

The Endless Options Problem

Technology has made opportunities feel infinite.

Candidates today can:

Apply in seconds Speak with multiple recruiters simultaneously Interview across industries Compare offers nationally Work remotely Access salary data instantly Watch employer branding content daily

The result?

Decision paralysis.

When people believe there is always another opportunity around the corner, committing becomes harder.

And ironically, the more options people have, the less decisive they often become.

Employers Are Feeling the Fatigue

This is one of the reasons hiring processes are becoming more cautious and layered.

Because businesses are exhausted.

Leaders are investing:

Hours into interviews Team alignment discussions Trial shifts Presentations Salary negotiations Recruitment marketing spend Internal onboarding preparation

Only for candidates to disappear, delay, “need more time,” or accept counteroffers.

The emotional fatigue on employers is real too.

Particularly in industries already stretched operationally.

But Candidates Aren’t Entirely Wrong Either

To be fair, many candidates have become cautious because they’ve learned hard lessons.

They’ve joined businesses where:

The culture didn’t match the interview The role was oversold Leadership changed quickly Burnout was normalised Career progression never eventuated Salary promises shifted Teams were understaffed They were treated like a number

So now people hesitate.

They overanalyse. They seek reassurance. They move slower.

Trust in employers overall is lower than it once was.

That hesitation is often self-protection.

Recruitment Has Become More About Psychology Than Ever

The best recruiters and leaders today are no longer just “selling jobs.”

They are reading human behaviour.

Understanding:

Timing Emotional readiness Career identity Risk tolerance Personal circumstances Motivation depth Burnout signals Ego versus reality Genuine intent versus curiosity

Because not every “great candidate” is actually placeable.

And that distinction matters more now than ever.

The Businesses Winning Right Now

The businesses attracting decisive, high-quality people are usually doing a few things well:

They move quickly

Top candidates lose momentum fast.

They create emotional connection

People join people, not job descriptions.

They communicate clearly

Ambiguity creates hesitation.

They show tangible growth

Candidates need to see a future, not just a role.

They respect the process

Long, disorganised hiring processes kill commitment.

They understand modern candidates

The market is no longer operating with 2018 behaviour patterns.

Final Thought

One of the biggest misconceptions in hiring right now is assuming interest equals intent.

It doesn’t.

Someone can like your brand. Like the role. Like the team. Like the salary.

And still not be ready to leave where they are.

That’s the reality of the current market.

Recruitment today is no longer just about finding talent.

It’s about finding people emotionally ready for change.